As it happened, the violence from the previous nights wasn’t repeated, but the big questions expected to be aimed at David Cameron are how will the police cope after the cuts have been made if riots once again erupt in the future? and won’t the lack of police available not actually induce rioting as they will take advantage of the lack of officers?

The Police Federation has already warned the Government that they are inviting a potential catastrophe.

A government source has said that the Home Office will be advised to take another look at its plans to cut a massive £2bn from the Police’s funding over the next couple of years. The source told the Guardian that the options have definitely changed. Chief constables were ordered by Theresa May, the Home Secretary, to cancel all police leave to have as many available to deal with the riot crisis.

Although the combination of extra officers and bad weather seem to have quelled the riots and relative calm has been restored, there were big fears of a backlash in Birmingham.  This was due to three young men dying after they were hit by a car on Tuesday night, but these fears, as yet, have failed to materialise. The West Midland doubled the number of their officers on duty in preparation, and despite there being 48 arrests they described the situation as calm.

Both the police and community leaders appealed for calm after the death of brothers Shazad Ali and Abdul Musavir, aged 30 and 31 respectively, and 21 year old Haroon

Jahan. The men were part of an 80 strong group guarding shops and a petrol station in Winston Green from looters on Wednesday when they were they were the victims of the hit and run.

It was all pretty calm in London too, apart from some clashes between the police and England Defence League supporters in Eltham. Scotland Yard has said that there have now been 888 arrests connected with the disorder that has taken place in the capital, and 371 have been charged.

The food safety commissioner for the EU, John Dali, has attacked Germany for dishing out warnings on the cause of the outbreak that haven’t been verified. These have caused panic amongst consumers, and it is now estimated to be costing the European farmers in the region of £200m a week. He said it was crucial that national authorities didn’t jump the gun and make unsubstantiated claims.

Freshfel Europe, a group in the agricultural industry, had published figures that show the sales of salad vegetables have either plummeted or dried up altogether right across Europe. This was in the wake of Germany blaming the whole outbreak on the Spanish cucumbers, a rash and thoughtless act that has caused widespread panic and left some farmers facing bankruptcy.

In areas where the cucumber sales hadn’t stopped altogether, they have dropped by 80% as did tomatoes, and the sales of lettuces were halved. There were angry scenes in the European Parliament when a Spanish MEP Francisco Sosa Wagner started to brandish a cucumber at Mr. Dali and demanded that the EU restore the consumer’s confidence in the safety of salad vegetables so that they will start buying them again.

As Germany has still not identified the true cause of the outbreak, the sales of salad vegetable have been hit further, and this has prompted to European Commission to put together an aid package for affected farmers worth £134m. British taxpayers are contributing 16.6m to this fund. The farm commissioner for the EU, Dacian Ciolos, has said that he hopes the German authorities will soon have the answers that everyone is waiting for.

The movie is the latest in one of the most successful movie franchises in film history. Its three young stars, one female and two male, have become part of our culture, and most people over 20 have watched the stars grow up in front of their eyes.

We also can not include any indication of the name of the world renowned, highly specialized school that offers pupils instruction in a black art, we also can not give any indication as to the name of the main character, or even if his name really does rhyme with ‘otter’ as reported on the front page of The Times, or not,. Reporters have been perplexed as the why the film company, who we can not name, would want to release a gigantic US-British movie in complete secrecy.

But it would seem according to the producer of the movie, Mr, Ms or Mrs X, (X is not the first letter of the persons surname, it was chosen purely at random, and it should not be inferred that X is indeed the first letter) it is their business and not in the public interest to know when the movie will hit the silver screen, and the plot, names of stars, and the address’s of their chiropractors need to be kept out of the public domain.

Anyway you will have to wait until get into the theater to see if you have the right movie as cinemas are also banned from advertising if the film is being shown, or not.

The information in these documents comes from sources that are somewhat dubious, as it was obtained from detainees at the camp, some of them undergoing torture in some form, or looking to avoid it by snitching on a fellow detainee.  From all reports, the documents never specified any ‘torture’ techniques, but there is no longer any question that such tactics were used, and that the information obtained may be less than factual.

The documents do indicate that many of the prisoners at Guantanamo were arrested on shaky or fabricated evidence, and some were held long after all charges had been disproved, on the suspicion that they might know something of use to their interrogators.  Some of these documents described al-Qaida activities and plots that were previously unknown or at least unverified.  They include magnetic limpet mines and remote-controlled bombs concealed in electronic games and altimeter watches, to name but a few.

WikiLeaks claims to have further documents in their possession that have not been released, some pertaining to high-ranking inmates held in the CIA’s ‘black sites’.  The Obama administration has criticized the media for releasing documents that most likely contain incorrect and/or unsubstantiated information, and that could prove hazardous to U.S. citizens.

According to current reports, 604 of those held at Guantanamo have been released or transferred, and there are 172 still imprisoned at the camp.  It has become apparent that many of those held at Guantanamo were not there because they were suspected of terrorist activity but only because they had been in contact, often involuntarily, with someone suspected of being involved with al-Qaida.

The fact remains that Osama bin Laden is still at large, and all the detentions and interrogations have never produced any facts that led even close to his capture – or none that have yet been revealed anyway.  At this point one has to wonder if the term ‘intelligence’ is actually a misnomer when it comes to the so-called intelligence service.

The Daily Telegraph has played a key role in uncovering the financial sins of these ‘entitled’ Members of Parliament.  During their investigation in 2009, the newspaper reported that Morley had been claiming an expense of £800 per month on a mortgage that did not exist.  It took a while, but he eventually admitted that he had “made a mistake”, but still insisted that it was an ‘honest’ mistake.

As the investigation progressed, it turned out that Morley had been blatantly and quite knowingly defrauding the taxpayers for years.  He paid off the mortgage on his main home in Lincolnshire in March 2006, but continued to claim the £800 in interest payments for another 21 months.  His excuse was that he forgot it was paid off, an unlikely scenario in the opinion of most Brit’s.

To add insult to injury, the former MP had also claimed a much higher interest payment than was actually charged, amounting to £15,800 in the 19 months before the loan was paid off.  On top of that, he had rented his London home to Ian Cawsey; another Labour MP who claimed £1,000 a month for expenses at the same time Morley was claiming no income from the property.

Granted, everyone makes mistakes.  However, Morley’s mistake in this case was not due to forgetfulness or ignorance of the facts.  His mistake was in purposely misusing his position and title for his own financial gain, and getting caught at it.  He is currently awaiting sentence, but whatever happens, he won’t be standing for Parliament again.

Now there have been reports and statistics released that indicate, to some at least, that the demise of the Registration Scheme will cost taxpayers a lot of money.   Tens of thousands of immigrants will be able to claim government benefits, including unemployment and housing subsidies, and they won’t have to register and get a permit to work in the U.K.

While there is rising concern about the current and potential impact on the British job market, the Department for Work and Pensions has said that restrictions will remain in place, and that they are working on reforms in the system that will limit immigration.  The DWP also says reassuringly that since Germany and Austria will be “opening their doors” employment-wise for the first time, much of the feared influx of job-hunters will probably stop closer to home instead of coming to Britain.

After Julian Assange surrendered himself to British authorities last week in response to the charges against him for several counts of sexual misbehaviour involving two Swedish women, a British court ruled that he should be released on bail.  Swedish prosecutors appealed the decision, Assange stayed in jail for another 48 hours, and then another judge overruled the appeal decision and turned him loose, with caveats.

The two Swedish women both accuse Assange of failure and/or refusal to use a condom during sex, and one claims he had sex with her sans condom while she was sleeping. For the record, in Sweden there is a law about having sex with someone who is drunk, unconscious or asleep; it can be considered rape, with a penalty of up to six years in prison.

Mr. Assange appears to be more concerned about the possibility of being extradited to the U.S. on charges of espionage.  Under U.S. law, that particular crime can result in the death penalty, and more than one voice high in U.S. government ranks has advocated just that as appropriate punishment for spilling all those secrets.  There is still that 1^st Amendment to the United States Constitution, which supposedly rants on about freedom of speech.

Julian Assange has a great many supporters, many of them very influential people.  If the whole thing doesn’t just fade away into the shadow of some real global crisis and Assange actually goes on trial for espionage, treason and/or receiving stolen property, the drama would be pretty riveting.Wi

The social worker for the young man claims that sex is one of the ‘human rights’ to which everyone is supposed to have access and that his client is a frustrated virgin.  It seems highly odd that the Government would approve funding for his escapade, given the fact that there are no doubt many 21 year old men at university who could relate.

His trip however is being funded via a £520m scheme from the previous government put in place to help those with disabilities.  Those with disabilities received a personal budget and the ability to choose how they spend the money.

The social worker said that the client was anxious and frustrated as a result of trying to find a sexual partner and that the man had taken part in two sexual awareness and health classes and is now ready to give it a go, so as to speak.

The social worker added that the girls in Amsterdam are much more safe when it comes to sex compared to those in Britain and that it seems better that social services help guide him, support him, and educate him through the process so that he can have his needs met in a licensed place so that he can grow as a person.

Critics claim that the use of taxpayer money to fund trips abroad for sex is disturbing and that something needs to be done.